What three configurations can help in identifying duplicate maintenance requests submitted less than 30 days apart?

The choice of configuring a time period for the request date as a weighted condition is an effective approach to identify duplicate maintenance requests submitted less than 30 days apart. By leveraging a weighted condition, the system can be set up to evaluate the specific time frame between requests, allowing it to ascertain whether new submissions fall within the designated 30-day window from previous requests. This configuration is crucial for accurately detecting duplicates based on the recency of submissions.

Implementing such a condition ensures that any new request is compared against existing records, and if it is found that another request with the same or similar attributes was submitted within the last 30 days, it is flagged accordingly. This approach enhances the efficiency of processing requests by preventing unnecessary duplication of effort and ensuring timely resolution of maintenance issues.

Additionally, a weighted condition is more flexible compared to a basic condition because it allows for a range of evaluation criteria that can incorporate various factors when determining duplicates, such as matching request dates and types while allowing room for exceptions.