Which two columns in a report should be optimized to prevent performance warnings?

Optimizing the columns in a report is essential for enhancing performance and avoiding performance warnings. Policy Number and Policy Holder are the correct columns to focus on for optimization because they typically represent key identifiers in a business process.

Policy Number often serves as a unique identifier for insurance cases, which allows for efficient retrieval and manipulation of data related to specific policies. Optimizing this column can significantly enhance query performance because systems can quickly access the relevant records based on this unique field, which reduces the load on the database when generating reports.

Having the Policy Holder as a second optimized column ensures that the report can efficiently filter or group data based on the individual or entity associated with the policy. This is particularly important in scenarios where reports need to segment data by holder for better insights or compliance.

In contrast, while the other options present potentially relevant columns, they may not offer the same performance benefits as focusing on these identifiers. Case ID, while critical for case tracking, may not require the same level of optimization compared to policy-specific identifiers in many use cases. Additionally, urgency and status indicators might be more dynamically generated or less static than identifiers, thus not benefiting as significantly from optimization techniques designed for retrieval efficiency.